[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230824220227.01c367c1d7b6219a79cf2843@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 22:02:27 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Francis Laniel <flaniel@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] tracing/kprobes: Return EADDRNOTAVAIL when
func matches several symbols
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 12:37:34 +0200
Francis Laniel <flaniel@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Previously to this commit, if func matches several symbols, a kprobe, being
> either sysfs or PMU, would only be installed for the first matching address.
> This could lead to some misunderstanding when some BPF code was never called
> because it was attached to a function which was indeed not call, because the
> effectively called one has no kprobes.
>
> So, this commit returns EADDRNOTAVAIL when func matches several symbols.
> This way, user needs to use addr to remove the ambiguity.
Thanks for update the patch. I have some comments there.
>
> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Francis Laniel <flaniel@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230819101105.b0c104ae4494a7d1f2eea742@kernel.org/
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index 23dba01831f7..0c8dd6ba650b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -705,6 +705,25 @@ static struct notifier_block trace_kprobe_module_nb = {
> .priority = 1 /* Invoked after kprobe module callback */
> };
>
> +static int count_symbols(void *data, unsigned long unused)
> +{
> + unsigned int *count = data;
> +
> + (*count)++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int func_name_several_symbols(char *func_name)
If this returns boolean, please use 'bool' for return type.
Also, I think 'func_name_is_unique()' is more natural.
> +{
> + unsigned int count;
> +
> + count = 0;
> + kallsyms_on_each_match_symbol(count_symbols, func_name, &count);
> +
> + return count > 1;
> +}
> +
> static int __trace_kprobe_create(int argc, const char *argv[])
> {
> /*
> @@ -836,6 +855,18 @@ static int __trace_kprobe_create(int argc, const char *argv[])
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If user specifies KSYM, we check it does not correspond to several
> + * symbols.
> + * If this is the case, we return EADDRNOTAVAIL to indicate the user
> + * he/she should use ADDR rather than KSYM to remove the ambiguity.
> + */
> + if (symbol && func_name_several_symbols(symbol)) {
Then, here will be
if (symbol && !func_name_is_unique(symbol)) {
> + ret = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> +
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> trace_probe_log_set_index(0);
> if (event) {
> ret = traceprobe_parse_event_name(&event, &group, gbuf,
> @@ -1699,6 +1730,7 @@ static int unregister_kprobe_event(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> +
> /* create a trace_kprobe, but don't add it to global lists */
> struct trace_event_call *
> create_local_trace_kprobe(char *func, void *addr, unsigned long offs,
> @@ -1709,6 +1741,16 @@ create_local_trace_kprobe(char *func, void *addr, unsigned long offs,
> int ret;
> char *event;
>
> + /*
> + * If user specifies func, we check that function name does not
> + * correspond to several symbols.
> + * If this is the case, we return EADDRNOTAVAIL to indicate the user
> + * he/she should use addr and offs rather than func to remove the
> + * ambiguity.
> + */
> + if (func && func_name_several_symbols(func))
Ditto.
Thanks!
> + return ERR_PTR(-EADDRNOTAVAIL);
> +
> /*
> * local trace_kprobes are not added to dyn_event, so they are never
> * searched in find_trace_kprobe(). Therefore, there is no concern of
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists