lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2023 17:39:48 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@...il.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/7] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: Add a function to
 retrieve number of bytes in buffer

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:23:09PM +0200, Mehdi Djait wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 4:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 03:44:29PM +0200, Mehdi Djait wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:39 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 03:52:56PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > > > On 8/24/23 14:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 11:16:40PM +0200, Mehdi Djait wrote:

...

> > > > I see. I think my confusion can be easily cured by renaming the callback to
> > > >
> > > >         get_amount_bytes_in_fifo()
> > > >
> > > > or
> > > >
> > > >         get_bytes_in_fifo()
> > > >
> > > > or alike.
> > >
> > > or leave it as is. The function is documented:
> >
> > > + * @get_fifo_bytes: function pointer to get number of bytes in the FIFO buffer
> >
> > Do you find it unambiguous? I do not.
> >
> > Still needs more words to explain if it's a capacity of FIFO or is it amount of
> > valid bytes for the current transfer or what?
> 
> how about change the description to:
> function pointer to get amount  of acceleration data bytes currently
> stored in the sensor's FIFO buffer
> 
> and change the function to "get_amount_bytes_in_fifo()"

Sounds good to me, thank you!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ