[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2fdba6ecda7a6b1e2ea048a3863fb302cc0f8d1.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:22:26 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wang, Lei4" <lei4.wang@...el.com>,
"Pan, Lijun" <lijun.pan@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Invalidate FPU state correctly on
exec()
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 09:11 +0000, tip-bot2 for Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> Fixes: 33344368cb08 ("x86/fpu: Clean up the fpu__clear() variants")
Oops, yes this looks correct. Sorry for the wrong characterization of
it being older.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists