linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of get/put_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230825162611.GA10654@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:26:11 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of
 get/put_task_struct

On 08/25, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Could you rebase this against bpf-next tree so this can run through our BPF
> CI? Right now the CI cannot pick the patch up due to merge conflict [0].
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>   [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230822120549.GA22091@redhat.com/

The merge failed because this patch depends on

	[PATCH] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of next_thread()

in this thread. But please forget.

I've sent the new series. It would be nice if you can test at least 1-5,
the last 6/6 depends on

	[PATCH 1/2] introduce __next_thread(), fix next_tid() vs exec() race
	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230824143142.GA31222@redhat.com/

which was not merged yet.

Oleg.