[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOkGCSNr0VN2VIJJ@p100>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 21:50:33 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] lib/clz_ctz.c: Fix __clzdi2() and __ctzdi2() for 32-bit
kernels
The gcc compiler translates on some architectures the 64-bit
__builtin_clzll() function to a call to the libgcc function
__clzdi2(), which should take a 64-bit parameter on 32- and 64-bit
platforms.
But in the current kernel code, the built-in __clzdi2() function is
defined to operate (wrongly) on 32-bit parameters if BITS_PER_LONG == 32,
thus the return values on 32-bit kernels are in the range from
[0..31] instead of the expected [0..63] range.
This patch fixes the in-kernel functions __clzdi2() and __ctzdi2() to
take a 64-bit parameter on 32-bit kernels as well, thus it makes the
functions identical for 32- and 64-bit kernels.
This bug went unnoticed since kernel 3.11 for over 10 years, and
here are some possible reasons for that:
a) Some architectures have assembly instructions to count the bits
and which are used instead of calling __clzdi2(), e.g. on x86 the
bsr instruction and on ppc cntlz is used. On such architectures
the wrong __clzdi2() implementation isn't used and as such the
bug has no effect and won't be noticed.
b) Some architectures link to libgcc.a, and the in-kernel weak
functions get replaced by the correct 64-bit variants from libgcc.a.
c) __builtin_clzll() and __clzdi2() doesn't seem to be used in many
places in the kernel, and most likely only in uncritical functions,
e.g. when printing hex values via seq_put_hex_ll(). The wrong return
value will still print the correct number, but just in a wrong formatting
(e.g. with too many leading zeroes).
d) 32-bit kernels aren't used that much any longer, so they are less
tested.
A trivial testcase to verify if the currently running 32-bit kernel
is affected by the bug is to look at the output of /proc/self/maps:
Here the kernel uses a correct implementation of __clzdi2():
root@...ian:~# cat /proc/self/maps
00010000-00019000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 787324 /usr/bin/cat
00019000-0001a000 rwxp 00009000 08:05 787324 /usr/bin/cat
0001a000-0003b000 rwxp 00000000 00:00 0 [heap]
f7551000-f770d000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 794765 /usr/lib/hppa-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
...
and this kernel uses the broken implementation of __clzdi2():
root@...ian:~# cat /proc/self/maps
0000000010000-0000000019000 r-xp 00000000 000000008:000000005 787324 /usr/bin/cat
0000000019000-000000001a000 rwxp 000000009000 000000008:000000005 787324 /usr/bin/cat
000000001a000-000000003b000 rwxp 00000000 00:00 0 [heap]
00000000f73d1000-00000000f758d000 r-xp 00000000 000000008:000000005 794765 /usr/lib/hppa-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
...
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Fixes: 4df87bb7b6a22 ("lib: add weak clz/ctz functions")
Cc: Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.11+
diff --git a/lib/clz_ctz.c b/lib/clz_ctz.c
index 0d3a686b5ba2..fb8c0c5c2bd2 100644
--- a/lib/clz_ctz.c
+++ b/lib/clz_ctz.c
@@ -28,36 +28,16 @@ int __weak __clzsi2(int val)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__clzsi2);
-int __weak __clzdi2(long val);
-int __weak __ctzdi2(long val);
-#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
-
-int __weak __clzdi2(long val)
+int __weak __clzdi2(u64 val);
+int __weak __clzdi2(u64 val)
{
- return 32 - fls((int)val);
+ return 64 - fls64(val);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__clzdi2);
-int __weak __ctzdi2(long val)
+int __weak __ctzdi2(u64 val);
+int __weak __ctzdi2(u64 val)
{
- return __ffs((u32)val);
+ return __ffs64(val);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ctzdi2);
-
-#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
-
-int __weak __clzdi2(long val)
-{
- return 64 - fls64((u64)val);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__clzdi2);
-
-int __weak __ctzdi2(long val)
-{
- return __ffs64((u64)val);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ctzdi2);
-
-#else
-#error BITS_PER_LONG not 32 or 64
-#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists