[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230825225006.GA642059@bhelgaas>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:50:06 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, kishon@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] PCI: epf-mhi: Make use of the alignment
restriction from EPF core
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 12:24:54PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Instead of hardcoding the alignment restriction in the EPF_MHI driver, make
> use of the info available from the EPF core that reflects the alignment
> restriction of the endpoint controller.
>
> For this purpose, let's introduce the get_align_offset() static function.
I thought this might be related to the [1/7] patch since they both
mention an alignment restriction in the EPF core, but [1/7] sets
pci_epc_features.align and this patch doesn't reference .align, so
this must be a different alignment restriction?
I'm sure there's nothing wrong here, and this is already applied, so
no need to do anything unless .align *should* appear here.
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> index 9c1f5a154fbd..bb7de6884824 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,11 @@ struct pci_epf_mhi {
> int irq;
> };
>
> +static size_t get_align_offset(struct pci_epc *epc, u64 addr)
> +{
> + return addr % epc->mem->window.page_size;
> +}
> +
> static int __pci_epf_mhi_alloc_map(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl, u64 pci_addr,
> phys_addr_t *paddr, void __iomem **vaddr,
> size_t offset, size_t size)
> @@ -134,7 +139,7 @@ static int pci_epf_mhi_alloc_map(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl, u64 pci_addr,
> {
> struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = to_epf_mhi(mhi_cntrl);
> struct pci_epc *epc = epf_mhi->epf->epc;
> - size_t offset = pci_addr & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
> + size_t offset = get_align_offset(epc, pci_addr);
>
> return __pci_epf_mhi_alloc_map(mhi_cntrl, pci_addr, paddr, vaddr,
> offset, size);
> @@ -161,7 +166,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_unmap_free(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl, u64 pci_addr,
> struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = to_epf_mhi(mhi_cntrl);
> struct pci_epf *epf = epf_mhi->epf;
> struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> - size_t offset = pci_addr & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
> + size_t offset = get_align_offset(epc, pci_addr);
>
> __pci_epf_mhi_unmap_free(mhi_cntrl, pci_addr, paddr, vaddr, offset,
> size);
> @@ -185,7 +190,8 @@ static int pci_epf_mhi_read_from_host(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl, u64 from,
> void *to, size_t size)
> {
> struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = to_epf_mhi(mhi_cntrl);
> - size_t offset = from % SZ_4K;
> + struct pci_epc *epc = epf_mhi->epf->epc;
> + size_t offset = get_align_offset(epc, from);
> void __iomem *tre_buf;
> phys_addr_t tre_phys;
> int ret;
> @@ -213,7 +219,8 @@ static int pci_epf_mhi_write_to_host(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl,
> void *from, u64 to, size_t size)
> {
> struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = to_epf_mhi(mhi_cntrl);
> - size_t offset = to % SZ_4K;
> + struct pci_epc *epc = epf_mhi->epf->epc;
> + size_t offset = get_align_offset(epc, to);
> void __iomem *tre_buf;
> phys_addr_t tre_phys;
> int ret;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists