[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50453723-813b-4d2b-2d83-3e2c57355230@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:57:36 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: simplify the "next tid"
logic
On 8/25/23 9:19 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Kill saved_tid. It looks ugly to update *tid and then restore the
> previous value if __task_pid_nr_ns() returns 0. Change this code
> to update *tid and common->pid_visiting once before return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists