linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/135] 5.10.192-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtVDzeAKWLmLOuBWcKzK62+qWYAvpUyp4TqTGKfHKFb+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2023 14:31:28 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/135] 5.10.192-rc1 review

On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 22:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.192 release.
> There are 135 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:05:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.192-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


The same test regressions found on stable-rc linux.5.10.y as reported
on stable-rc linux.6.1.y and linux.5.15.y branch. LTP syscalls chown02
and fchown02 fails on arm64 Rpi4 device with the NFS rootfile system.

Test log:
--------
chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile1, 0, 0) passed
chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile2, 0, 0) passed
chown02.c:58: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700, expected 0102700

fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(3, 0, 0) passed
fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(4, 0, 0) passed
fchown02.c:67: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700,
expected 0102700

NOTE:
Do we need a backport for this patch ?

  nfsd: use vfs setgid helper
    commit 2d8ae8c417db284f598dffb178cc01e7db0f1821 upstream.

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.191-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: da59b7b5c515edab9a57efd37b031b5b97e6c1cc
* git describe: v5.10.190-136-gda59b7b5c515
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.190-136-gda59b7b5c515

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.191)
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-syscalls
  - chown02
  - fchown02

* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-syscalls
  - chown02
  - fchown02

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org