[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230825112633.236607-11-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:26:30 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/13] dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance capabilities of power-domains
The power-domains bindings has in many years been used to describe so
called performance-domains too. Rather than using a separate binding it has
been convenient to re-use the power-domain bindings, as in some cases it's
in fact a combination of the both that would be the best description.
Therefore, let's make it more clear that the power-domains bindings can be
used to describe a performance-domain too.
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- New patch.
---
.../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
index d1235e562041..8fdb529d560b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
@@ -13,8 +13,9 @@ maintainers:
description: |+
System on chip designs are often divided into multiple PM domains that can be
- used for power gating of selected IP blocks for power saving by reduced leakage
- current.
+ used for power gating of selected IP blocks for power saving by reduced
+ leakage current. Moreover, in some cases the similar PM domains may also be
+ capable of scaling performance for a group of IP blocks.
This device tree binding can be used to bind PM domain consumer devices with
their PM domains provided by PM domain providers. A PM domain provider can be
@@ -25,7 +26,7 @@ description: |+
properties:
$nodename:
- pattern: "^(power-controller|power-domain)([@-].*)?$"
+ pattern: "^(power-controller|power-domain|performance-domain)([@-].*)?$"
domain-idle-states:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
@@ -44,11 +45,11 @@ properties:
operating-points-v2:
description:
- Phandles to the OPP tables of power domains provided by a power domain
- provider. If the provider provides a single power domain only or all
- the power domains provided by the provider have identical OPP tables,
- then this shall contain a single phandle. Refer to ../opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
- for more information.
+ Phandles to the OPP tables of power domains that are capable of scaling
+ performance, provided by a power domain provider. If the provider provides
+ a single power domain only or all the power domains provided by the
+ provider have identical OPP tables, then this shall contain a single
+ phandle. Refer to ../opp/opp-v2-base.yaml for more information.
"#power-domain-cells":
description:
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists