[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f2438fc-2360-8833-3751-fe3bc8b11afb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 16:39:22 +0200
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/18] perf s390 s390_cpumcfdg_dump: Don't scan all
PMUs
On 8/25/23 15:14, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:20 AM Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/24/23 15:59, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:13:18PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
>>>> Rather than scanning all PMUs for a counter name, scan the PMU
>>>> associated with the evsel of the sample. This is done to remove a
>>>> dependence on pmu-events.h.
>>>
>>> I'm applying this one, and CCing the S/390 developers so that they can
>>> try this and maybe provide an Acked-by/Tested-by,
>>>
>>> - Arnaldo
>>
>>
>> Arnaldo,
>>
>> I have downloaded this patch set of 18 patches (using b4), but they do not
>> apply on my git tree.
>>
>> Which git branch do I have to use to test this. Thanks a lot.
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> the changes are in the perf-tools-next tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
Hi Ian,
thanks for the pointer.
Unfurtunately this patch set fails again on s390.
Here is the test output from the current 6.5.0rc7 kernel:
# ./perf test 6 10 'perf all metricgroups test' 'perf all metrics test'
6: Parse event definition strings :
6.1: Test event parsing : Ok
6.2: Parsing of all PMU events from sysfs : Ok
6.3: Parsing of given PMU events from sysfs : Ok
6.4: Parsing of aliased events from sysfs : Skip (no aliases in sysfs)
6.5: Parsing of aliased events : Ok
6.6: Parsing of terms (event modifiers) : Ok
10: PMU events :
10.1: PMU event table sanity : Ok
10.2: PMU event map aliases : Ok
10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics : Ok
10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs : Ok
10.5: Parsing of metric thresholds with fake PMUs : Ok
95: perf all metricgroups test : Ok
96: perf all metrics test : Ok
#
This looks good.
However when I use the check-out from perf-tools-next, I get this output:
# ./perf test 6 10 'perf all metricgroups test' 'perf all metrics test'
6: Parse event definition strings :
6.1: Test event parsing : Ok
6.2: Parsing of all PMU events from sysfs : FAILED!
6.3: Parsing of given PMU events from sysfs : Ok
6.4: Parsing of aliased events from sysfs : Skip (no aliases in sysfs)
6.5: Parsing of aliased events : FAILED!
6.6: Parsing of terms (event modifiers) : Ok
10: PMU events :
10.1: PMU event table sanity : Ok
10.2: PMU event map aliases : FAILED!
10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics : Ok
10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs : FAILED!
10.5: Parsing of metric thresholds with fake PMUs : Ok
93: perf all metricgroups test : FAILED!
94: perf all metrics test : FAILED!
#
So some tests are failing again.
I am out for the next two weeks, Sumanth Korikkar (on to list) might be able to help.
Thanks a lot.
--
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Powered by blists - more mailing lists