[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230826095836.1138608-1-liaochang1@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 09:58:36 +0000
From: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
<srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix the race condition while updating the transition_task of policy
The field 'transition_task' of policy structure is used to track the
task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this field to
print a warning once detect a case where the same task is calling
_begin() again before completing the preivous frequency transition via
the _end().
However, there is a potential race condition in _end() and _begin() APIs
while updating the field 'transition_task' of policy, the scenario is
depicted below:
Task A Task B
/* 1st freq transition */
Invoke _begin() {
...
...
}
/* 2nd freq transition */
Invoke _begin() {
... //waiting for A to
... //clear
... //transition_ongoing
... //in _end() for
... //the 1st transition
|
Change the frequency |
|
Invoke _end() { |
... |
... |
transition_ongoing = false; V
transition_ongoing = true;
transition_task = current;
transition_task = NULL;
... //A overwrites the task
... //performing the transition
... //result in error warning.
}
To fix this race condition, the order of the updates to the
'transition_task' and 'transition_ongoing' fields has been changed, the
'transition_task' field is now cleared before the 'transition_ongoing'
field, which ensure that only one task can update the 'transition_task'
field at a time.
Fixes: ca654dc3a93d ("cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end")
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a757f90aa9d6..f8eb6dde57f2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -455,8 +455,8 @@ void cpufreq_freq_transition_end(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
policy->cur,
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
- policy->transition_ongoing = false;
policy->transition_task = NULL;
+ policy->transition_ongoing = false;
wake_up(&policy->transition_wait);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists