[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOpfUjRy3jDwZixX@alolivei-thinkpadt480s.gru.csb>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:23:46 -0300
From: Alexon Oliveira <alexondunkan@...il.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, martyn@...chs.me.uk,
manohar.vanga@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] staging: vme_user: fix check alignment of open
parenthesis in vme_fake.c
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 09:47:16PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 12:13:05PM -0300, Alexon Oliveira wrote:
> > Fixed all CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> > as reported by checkpatch to adhere to the Linux kernel
> > coding-style guidelines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexon Oliveira <alexondunkan@...il.com>
>
> Patch series should be in a single email thread. But your 4 patches are sent
> separately :(
>
Hmm, ACK, I didn't know that.
> Have a look at how your patches are sent on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/
> and you will see what I am referring to.
>
Indeed they were sent as separate emails.
> Here's an example of how patch series should be:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/736c8159-90e9-4575-3c22-5a62515d5c03@gmail.com/T/#t
>
Please, if you don't mind me to ask, how's the best way to do that?
I've already wrote the cover letter, generated the patches' files again,
but I don't know how is the best way to send them as you instructed me
using mutt.
> Best regards,
> Nam
Thank you.
Alexon Oliveira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists