[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d31eb7c5-6509-47b0-a451-fba88cfa4d58@lucifer.local>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 10:42:44 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kirill A Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] selftests: mm: Add a test for remapping to area
immediately after existing mapping
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 01:54:58AM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> This patch adds support for verifying that we correctly handle the
> situation where something is already mapped before the destination of the remap.
>
> Any realignment of destination address and PMD-copy will destroy that
> existing mapping. In such cases, we need to avoid doing the optimization.
>
> To test this, we map an area called the preamble before the remap
> region. Then we verify after the mremap operation that this region did not get
> corrupted.
>
> Putting some prints in the kernel, I verified that we optimize
> correctly in different situations:
>
> Optimize when there is alignment and no previous mapping (this is tested
> by previous patch).
> <prints>
> can_align_down(old_vma->vm_start=2900000, old_addr=2900000, mask=-2097152): 0
> can_align_down(new_vma->vm_start=2f00000, new_addr=2f00000, mask=-2097152): 0
> === Starting move_page_tables ===
> Doing PUD move for 2800000 -> 2e00000 of extent=200000 <-- Optimization
> Doing PUD move for 2a00000 -> 3000000 of extent=200000
> Doing PUD move for 2c00000 -> 3200000 of extent=200000
> </prints>
>
> Don't optimize when there is alignment but there is previous mapping
> (this is tested by this patch).
> Notice that can_align_down() returns 1 for the destination mapping
> as we detected there is something there.
> <prints>
> can_align_down(old_vma->vm_start=2900000, old_addr=2900000, mask=-2097152): 0
> can_align_down(new_vma->vm_start=5700000, new_addr=5700000, mask=-2097152): 1
> === Starting move_page_tables ===
> Doing move_ptes for 2900000 -> 5700000 of extent=100000 <-- Unoptimized
> Doing PUD move for 2a00000 -> 5800000 of extent=200000
> Doing PUD move for 2c00000 -> 5a00000 of extent=200000
> </prints>
>
Have you additionally tested this by changing the code to be intentionally
broken then running the test and observing it fail?
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
> index 6304eb0947a3..d7366074e2a8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct config {
> unsigned long long dest_alignment;
> unsigned long long region_size;
> int overlapping;
> + int dest_preamble_size;
> };
>
> struct test {
> @@ -283,7 +284,7 @@ static void *get_source_mapping(struct config c)
> static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
> char pattern_seed)
> {
> - void *addr, *src_addr, *dest_addr;
> + void *addr, *src_addr, *dest_addr, *dest_preamble_addr;
> unsigned long long i;
> struct timespec t_start = {0, 0}, t_end = {0, 0};
> long long start_ns, end_ns, align_mask, ret, offset;
> @@ -300,7 +301,7 @@ static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - /* Set byte pattern */
> + /* Set byte pattern for source block. */
> srand(pattern_seed);
> for (i = 0; i < threshold; i++)
> memset((char *) src_addr + i, (char) rand(), 1);
> @@ -312,6 +313,9 @@ static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
> addr = (void *) (((unsigned long long) src_addr + c.region_size
> + offset) & align_mask);
>
> + /* Remap after the destination block preamble. */
> + addr += c.dest_preamble_size;
> +
> /* See comment in get_source_mapping() */
> if (!((unsigned long long) addr & c.dest_alignment))
> addr = (void *) ((unsigned long long) addr | c.dest_alignment);
> @@ -327,6 +331,24 @@ static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
> addr += c.dest_alignment;
> }
>
> + if (c.dest_preamble_size) {
> + dest_preamble_addr = mmap((void *) addr - c.dest_preamble_size, c.dest_preamble_size,
> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED,
> + -1, 0);
> + if (dest_preamble_addr == MAP_FAILED) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Failed to map dest preamble region: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + ret = -1;
> + goto clean_up_src;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set byte pattern for the dest preamble block. */
> + srand(pattern_seed);
> + for (i = 0; i < c.dest_preamble_size; i++)
> + memset((char *) dest_preamble_addr + i, (char) rand(), 1);
> + }
> +
> clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &t_start);
> dest_addr = mremap(src_addr, c.region_size, c.region_size,
> MREMAP_MAYMOVE|MREMAP_FIXED, (char *) addr);
> @@ -335,7 +357,7 @@ static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
> if (dest_addr == MAP_FAILED) {
> ksft_print_msg("mremap failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> ret = -1;
> - goto clean_up_src;
> + goto clean_up_dest_preamble;
> }
>
> /* Verify byte pattern after remapping */
> @@ -353,6 +375,23 @@ static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
> }
> }
>
> + /* Verify the dest preamble byte pattern after remapping */
> + if (c.dest_preamble_size) {
> + srand(pattern_seed);
> + for (i = 0; i < c.dest_preamble_size; i++) {
> + char c = (char) rand();
> +
> + if (((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[i] != c) {
> + ksft_print_msg("Preamble data after remap doesn't match at offset %d\n",
> + i);
> + ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", c & 0xff,
> + ((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[i] & 0xff);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto clean_up_dest;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> start_ns = t_start.tv_sec * NS_PER_SEC + t_start.tv_nsec;
> end_ns = t_end.tv_sec * NS_PER_SEC + t_end.tv_nsec;
> ret = end_ns - start_ns;
> @@ -365,6 +404,9 @@ static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
> */
> clean_up_dest:
> munmap(dest_addr, c.region_size);
> +clean_up_dest_preamble:
> + if (c.dest_preamble_size && dest_preamble_addr)
> + munmap(dest_preamble_addr, c.dest_preamble_size);
> clean_up_src:
> munmap(src_addr, c.region_size);
> out:
> @@ -440,7 +482,7 @@ static int parse_args(int argc, char **argv, unsigned int *threshold_mb,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#define MAX_TEST 14
> +#define MAX_TEST 15
> #define MAX_PERF_TEST 3
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> @@ -449,7 +491,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> unsigned int threshold_mb = VALIDATION_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD;
> unsigned int pattern_seed;
> int num_expand_tests = 2;
> - struct test test_cases[MAX_TEST];
> + struct test test_cases[MAX_TEST] = {};
> struct test perf_test_cases[MAX_PERF_TEST];
> int page_size;
> time_t t;
> @@ -510,6 +552,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> test_cases[13] = MAKE_TEST(_1MB, _1MB, _5MB, NON_OVERLAPPING, EXPECT_SUCCESS,
> "5MB mremap - Source 1MB-aligned, Destination 1MB-aligned");
>
> + /* Src and Dest addr 1MB aligned. 5MB mremap. */
> + test_cases[14] = MAKE_TEST(_1MB, _1MB, _5MB, NON_OVERLAPPING, EXPECT_SUCCESS,
> + "5MB mremap - Source 1MB-aligned, Dest 1MB-aligned with 40MB Preamble");
> + test_cases[14].config.dest_preamble_size = 10 * _4MB;
> +
> perf_test_cases[0] = MAKE_TEST(page_size, page_size, _1GB, NON_OVERLAPPING, EXPECT_SUCCESS,
> "1GB mremap - Source PTE-aligned, Destination PTE-aligned");
> /*
> --
> 2.42.0.rc1.204.g551eb34607-goog
>
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists