lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOtK7LwdDbVzCvjR@arm.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Aug 2023 16:09:00 +0300
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, joey.gouly@....com, mhocko@...e.com,
        david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com, izbyshev@...ras.ru,
        broonie@...nel.org, szabolcs.nagy@....com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        gthelen@...gle.com, toiwoton@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mm: Add a NO_INHERIT flag to the PR_SET_MDWE prctl

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 03:38:36PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:36:28PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:
> >  static inline int prctl_set_mdwe(unsigned long bits, unsigned long arg3,
> >  				 unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5)
> >  {
> > +	unsigned long current_bits;
> > +
> >  	if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	if (bits & ~(PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN))
> > +	if (bits & ~(PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN | PR_MDWE_NO_INHERIT))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* NO_INHERIT only makes sense with REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN */
> > +	if (bits & PR_MDWE_NO_INHERIT && !(bits & PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > +	current_bits = get_current_mdwe();
> > +	if (current_bits && current_bits != bits)
> > +		return -EPERM; /* Cannot unset the flags */
> 
> I was pondering why PR_MDWE_NO_INHERIT can't be unset, but I guess it
> doesn't matter. Anything forked with have it off, and any process
> wanting to launch stuff before locking down can just skip running the
> prctl() until later.

I had a similar doubt initially but then realised that the no-inherit
mode won't be inherited and concluded it's ok.

-- 
Catalin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ