linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/149] 6.1.46-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023082743-obsessive-thumb-01f7@gregkh>
Date:   Sun, 27 Aug 2023 18:34:50 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/149] 6.1.46-rc1 review

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 04:21:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 05:48:59PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 06:26:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 07:04:57AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.46 release.
> > > > > There are 149 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:16:53 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > > Booting with f2fs root file systems still crashes in this release
> > > > candidate. Would it make sense to mark f2fs as broken in v6.1.y ?
> > > 
> > > Ick, yeah, let me dig into this next week and figure out what went
> > > wrong...
> > 
> > I've now pushed out 6.1.49-rc1 with the last 3 f2fs patches reverted,
> > and a single objtool fix.  Hopefully that should resolve this issue, if
> > not, please let me know.
> > 
> 
> That does fix the problem.

Wonderful, thanks for testing.

greg k-h