lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a6222f2-a9e7-1c96-b92b-b21e6c76c205@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2023 20:43:16 +0100
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     rfoss@...nel.org, todor.too@...il.com, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
        andrey.konovalov@...aro.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/15] media: qcom: camss: Untangle if/else spaghetti
 in camss

On 28/08/2023 19:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>>   		return -EINVAL;
> This should never happen, as adding support for a new SoC should come
> with an update for all the applicable switch/case statements. It's
> useful to let the compiler complain if someone forgets to do so, but
> with a default case, you will only see the issue at runtime. Could it be
> caught at compile time ?
> 

Off the top of my head, I don't think it could be easily caught.

An assert() would catch it early in runtime..

---
bod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ