[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c0e76ab-1e3a-70d6-24dc-32b2e66c2a3a@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:25:14 -0700
From: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<mathias.nyman@...el.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
<bgoswami@...cinc.com>, <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, <oneukum@...e.com>,
<albertccwang@...gle.com>, <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 31/32] sound: usb: card: Allow for rediscovery of
connected USB SND devices
Hi Takashi,
On 7/25/2023 2:27 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:15:11 +0200,
> Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/25/23 04:34, Wesley Cheng wrote:
>>> In case of notifying SND platform drivers of connection events, some of
>>> these use cases, such as offloading, require an ASoC USB backend device to
>>> be initialized before the events can be handled. If the USB backend device
>>> has not yet been probed, this leads to missing initial USB audio device
>>> connection events.
>>>
>>> Expose an API that traverses the usb_chip array for connected devices, and
>>> to call the respective connection callback registered to the SND platform
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> sound/usb/card.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> sound/usb/card.h | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sound/usb/card.c b/sound/usb/card.c
>>> index 365f6d978608..27a89aaa0bf3 100644
>>> --- a/sound/usb/card.c
>>> +++ b/sound/usb/card.c
>>> @@ -170,6 +170,25 @@ struct snd_usb_stream *snd_usb_find_suppported_substream(int card_idx,
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_usb_find_suppported_substream);
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * in case the platform driver was not ready at the time of USB SND
>>> + * device connect, expose an API to discover all connected USB devices
>>> + * so it can populate any dependent resources/structures.
>>> + */
>>> +void snd_usb_rediscover_devices(void)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(®ister_mutex);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_CARDS; i++) {
>>> + if (usb_chip[i])
>>> + if (platform_ops && platform_ops->connect_cb)
>>> + platform_ops->connect_cb(usb_chip[i]);
>>
>> what happens if the USB device is removed while the platform device adds
>> a port?
>
> That should be protected by the register_mutex. But there can be
> other races (see below :)
>
>> This sounds super-racy to me. It's the same set of problems we're having
>> between audio and display/DRM, I would be surprised if this function
>> dealt with all corner cases of insertion/removal, bind/unbind.
>
> Yes, we need to be more careful about binding.
>
> For example, in the current patch set, I see no way to prevent
> unloading snd-usb-audio-qmi module, and it allows user to cut off the
> stuff during operation, which may break things while the kernel is
> running the code of the unloaded module. You need to have a proper
> module refcount management for avoiding such a scenario. Most of
> drivers don't need it because ALSA core part already takes care of
> it. But in this case, it requires a manual adjustment.
>
Sorry for the delayed response...this was routed to another folder, and
missed it.
I see, that is a valid situation, so I think the best way to address it
is to do something like the following:
static void __exit qc_usb_audio_offload_exit(void)
{
...
snd_usb_unregister_platform_ops();
for (idx = 0; idx < SNDRV_CARDS; idx++)
qc_usb_audio_offload_disconnect(uadev[idx].chip);
We'll first unregister the platform ops, so that we get no further
connect/disconnect CBs, and then we'll forcefully ensure that all
devices are removed/cleaned. Part of the USB offload disconnect
sequence will also forcefully stop the offload path on the external DSP
by issuing a disconnect indication QMI message.
Then we can safely clean up the rest of the resources. We do have
refcounting in place for several of the other structures, but I think in
the module exit case, we need to ensure the offload path is stopped fully.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists