[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230828070027.gdinkbswbnn3jg3e@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:30:27 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix typo in the comment of
CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS
On 26-08-23, 09:54, Liao Chang wrote:
> Replace 'diver' with 'driver'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 43b363a99215..43c771e502d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> /*
> * Set by drivers that need to update internal upper and lower boundaries along
> * with the target frequency and so the core and governors should also invoke
> - * the diver if the target frequency does not change, but the policy min or max
> + * the driver if the target frequency does not change, but the policy min or max
> * may have changed.
> */
> #define CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS BIT(0)
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists