[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a49737f0-0a09-b558-ea06-b3d47a6e4240@starfivetech.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:12:35 +0800
From: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Emil Renner Berthing" <kernel@...il.dk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 0/4] StarFive's Pulse Width Modulation driver support
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 16:06:12 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 04:13:24PM +0800, William Qiu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patchset adds initial rudimentary support for the StarFive
>> Pulse Width Modulation controller driver. And this driver will
>> be used in StarFive's VisionFive 2 board.The first patch add
>> Documentations for the device and Patch 2 adds device probe for
>> the module.
>>
>> Changes v3->v4:
>> - Rebased to v6.5rc7.
>> - Sorted the header files in alphabetic order.
>> - Changed iowrite32() to writel().
>> - Added a way to turn off.
>> - Moified polarity inversion implementation.
>> - Added 7100 support.
>> - Added dts patches.
>> - Used the various helpers in linux/math.h.
>> - Corrected formatting problems.
>> - Renamed dtbinding to 'starfive,jh7100-pwm.yaml'.
>> - Dropped the redundant code.
>>
>> Changes v2->v3:
>> - Fixed some formatting issues.
>>
>> Changes v1->v2:
>> - Renamed the dt-binding 'pwm-starfive.yaml' to 'starfive,jh7110-pwm.yaml'.
>> - Dropped the compatible's Items.
>> - Dropped the unuse defines.
>> - Modified the code to follow the Linux coding style.
>> - Changed return value to dev_err_probe.
>> - Dropped the unnecessary local variable.
>>
>> The patch series is based on v6.5rc7.
>
> Out of curiosity, why is this series still an RFC?
There was no comments received in v4. So William resend it and
request for comments.
Best regards,
Hal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists