[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOxko5RB0ZilMHv5@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:10:59 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] MIPS: TXx9: Do PCI error checks on own line
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 04:36:59PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Instead of if conditions with line splits, use the usual error handling
> pattern with a separate variable to improve readability.
>
> The second check can use reverse logic which reduces indentation level.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/mips/txx9/generic/pci.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists