linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-binding: pinctrl: Add NPCM8XX pinctrl and GPIO documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6aae4d40-e922-4e63-02a4-e56385af6069@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:30:33 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
Cc:     linus.walleij@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        avifishman70@...il.com, tali.perry1@...il.com, joel@....id.au,
        venture@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com, benjaminfair@...gle.com,
        j.neuschaefer@....net, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-binding: pinctrl: Add NPCM8XX pinctrl and GPIO
 documentation

On 28/08/2023 13:43, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>
>>> Which leds to second
>>> question - how pinctrl could have @0? It's already taken by SoC! So your
>>> DTS here - unit address and ranges - are clearly wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>> BTW, I have run both dt_binding_check and W=1 dtbs_check, and didn't
>>>> see an issue related to the pinctrl: pinctrl@...00260, do I need to
>>>> add another flag to see the issue?
>>>
>>> Did you read my message last time? I said - it's about DTS, not the binding.
> yes, understood doesn't the dtbs_check check the DTS?

Yes, it does, and the first error is being reported (just like several
others for your DTS...). The second about gpio node, I think is not.

Best regards,
Krzysztof