linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230828130240.4814c106@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2023 13:02:40 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@...co.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h

between commit:

  5a43b07a8783 ("scsi: fnic: Replace return codes in fnic_clean_pending_aborts()")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  15924b050363 ("scsi: fnic: Replace sgreset tag with max_tag_id")

from the scsi-mkp tree.

I fixed it up (it was just the version number, so I used the latter) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped