lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZO4fvAKJfKs8USZO@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:41:32 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
Cc:     Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module/decompress: use vmalloc() for zstd decompression
 workspace

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Using kmalloc() to allocate the decompression workspace for zstd may
> trigger the following warning when large modules are loaded (i.e., xfs):
> 
> [    2.961884] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 254 at mm/page_alloc.c:4453 __alloc_pages+0x2c3/0x350
> ...
> [    2.989033] Call Trace:
> [    2.989841]  <TASK>
> [    2.990614]  ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80
> [    2.991573]  ? __warn+0x89/0x160
> [    2.992485]  ? __alloc_pages+0x2c3/0x350
> [    2.993520]  ? report_bug+0x17e/0x1b0
> [    2.994506]  ? handle_bug+0x51/0xa0
> [    2.995474]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x80
> [    2.996469]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
> [    2.997530]  ? module_zstd_decompress+0xdc/0x2a0
> [    2.998665]  ? __alloc_pages+0x2c3/0x350
> [    2.999695]  ? module_zstd_decompress+0xdc/0x2a0
> [    3.000821]  __kmalloc_large_node+0x7a/0x150
> [    3.001920]  __kmalloc+0xdb/0x170
> [    3.002824]  module_zstd_decompress+0xdc/0x2a0
> [    3.003857]  module_decompress+0x37/0xc0
> [    3.004688]  init_module_from_file+0xd0/0x100
> [    3.005668]  idempotent_init_module+0x11c/0x2b0
> [    3.006632]  __x64_sys_finit_module+0x64/0xd0
> [    3.007568]  do_syscall_64+0x59/0x90
> [    3.008373]  ? ksys_read+0x73/0x100
> [    3.009395]  ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x30/0xb0
> [    3.010531]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x37/0x60
> [    3.011662]  ? do_syscall_64+0x68/0x90
> [    3.012511]  ? do_syscall_64+0x68/0x90
> [    3.013364]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
> 
> However, continuous physical memory does not seem to be required in
> module_zstd_decompress(), so use vmalloc() instead, to prevent the
> warning and avoid potential failures at loading compressed modules.
> 
> Fixes: 169a58ad824d ("module/decompress: Support zstd in-kernel decompression")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
> ---
>  kernel/module/decompress.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/module/decompress.c b/kernel/module/decompress.c
> index 8a5d6d63b06c..87440f714c0c 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/decompress.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/decompress.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static ssize_t module_zstd_decompress(struct load_info *info,
>  	}
>  
>  	wksp_size = zstd_dstream_workspace_bound(header.windowSize);
> -	wksp = kmalloc(wksp_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	wksp = vmalloc(wksp_size);
>  	if (!wksp) {
>  		retval = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out;
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static ssize_t module_zstd_decompress(struct load_info *info,
>  	retval = new_size;
>  
>   out:
> -	kfree(wksp);
> +	vfree(wksp);
>  	return retval;

Thanks! Applied and queued up.

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ