[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230829182720.331083-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:27:17 -0400
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] vfio: use __aligned_u64 for ioctl structs
v2:
- Rebased onto https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git next to get the
vfio_iommu_type1_info pad field [Kevin]
- Fixed min(minsz, sizeof(dmabuf)) -> min(dmabuf.argsz, sizeof(dmabuf)) [Jason, Kevin]
- Squashed Patch 3 (vfio_iommu_type1_info) into Patch 1 since it is trivial now
that the padding field is already there.
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> pointed out that u64 VFIO ioctl struct fields
have architecture-dependent alignment. iommufd already uses __aligned_u64 to
avoid this problem.
See the __aligned_u64 typedef in <uapi/linux/types.h> for details on why it is
a good idea for kernel<->user interfaces.
This series modifies the VFIO ioctl structs to use __aligned_u64. Some of the
changes preserve the existing memory layout on all architectures, so I put them
together into the first patch. The remaining patches are for structs where
explanation is necessary about why changing the memory layout does not break
the uapi.
Stefan Hajnoczi (3):
vfio: trivially use __aligned_u64 for ioctl structs
vfio: use __aligned_u64 in struct vfio_device_gfx_plane_info
vfio: use __aligned_u64 in struct vfio_device_ioeventfd
include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 4 +++-
samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c | 6 ++++--
samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c | 4 +++-
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists