[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppNGs0UVhBJq_+RFt8pALEk0tEoKfUo1AxzbSu82A5_HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 21:46:20 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kishon@...nel.org, robert.marko@...tura.hr, robh+dt@...nel.org,
geert+renesas@...der.be, peng.fan@....com,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, will@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
quic_varada@...cinc.com, vkoul@...nel.org, nfraprado@...labora.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com,
rafal@...ecki.pl, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
luka.perkov@...tura.hr, andersson@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,uniphy: Add ipq5332 USB3 SS UNIPHY
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 20:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 29/08/2023 16:35, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 19:28:13 +0530, Praveenkumar I wrote:
> >> Add ipq5332 USB3 SS UNIPHY support.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,uniphy.yaml | 117 +++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> >
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > In file included from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,uniphy.example.dts:45:
> > ./scripts/dtc/include-prefixes/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq5332-gcc.h:19: warning: "GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK" redefined
> > 19 | #define GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK 10
> > |
>
> So the only patch which actually needed dependency information did not
> have it. All other patches have something, even defconfig (!). Confusing.
Much simpler. This patch adds a second example to the schema. Both
examples include something-gcc.h. As both examples end up in the same
example.dts file, second include conflicts with the first one.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists