lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f09d1d92-3e32-46a6-d20d-41bf74268d0c@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2023 22:04:02 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, yonghong.song@...ux.dev
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+97522333291430dd277f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        haoluo@...gle.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        martin.lau@...ux.dev, sdf@...gle.com, song@...nel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yhs@...com,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] KCSAN: data-race in bpf_percpu_array_update /
 bpf_percpu_array_update (2)

On 8/29/23 8:53 PM, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 20:30, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev> wrote:
>> On 8/29/23 5:39 AM, syzbot wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>>
>>> HEAD commit:    727dbda16b83 Merge tag 'hardening-v6.6-rc1' of git://git.k..
>>> git tree:       upstream
>>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=136f39dfa80000
>>> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=dea9c2ce3f646a25
>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=97522333291430dd277f
>>> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>>>
>>> Downloadable assets:
>>> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9923a023ab11/disk-727dbda1.raw.xz
>>> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/650dbc695d77/vmlinux-727dbda1.xz
>>> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/361da71276bf/bzImage-727dbda1.xz
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+97522333291430dd277f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>>
>>> ==================================================================
>>> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in bpf_percpu_array_update / bpf_percpu_array_update
>>>
>>> write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8257 on cpu 1:
>>>    bpf_long_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:428 [inline]
>>>    bpf_obj_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:441 [inline]
>>>    copy_map_value_long include/linux/bpf.h:464 [inline]
>>>    bpf_percpu_array_update+0x3bb/0x500 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:380
>>>    bpf_map_update_value+0x190/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:175
>>>    generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1749
>>>    bpf_map_do_batch+0x2df/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4648
>>>    __sys_bpf+0x28a/0x780
>>>    __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5241 [inline]
>>>    __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 [inline]
>>>    __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239
>>>    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>>>    do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>>>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>>>
>>> write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8268 on cpu 0:
>>>    bpf_long_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:428 [inline]
>>>    bpf_obj_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:441 [inline]
>>>    copy_map_value_long include/linux/bpf.h:464 [inline]
>>>    bpf_percpu_array_update+0x3bb/0x500 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:380
>>>    bpf_map_update_value+0x190/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:175
>>>    generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1749
>>>    bpf_map_do_batch+0x2df/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4648
>>>    __sys_bpf+0x28a/0x780
>>>    __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5241 [inline]
>>>    __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 [inline]
>>>    __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239
>>>    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>>>    do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>>>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>>>
>>> value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0xfffffff000002788
>>>
>>> Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 8268 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.5.0-syzkaller-00453-g727dbda16b83 #0
>>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
>>> ==================================================================
>>
>> This case is with two tasks doing bpf_map batch update together for the
>> same map and key.
>>     > write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8257 on cpu 1:
>>     > write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8268 on cpu 0:
>>
>> So concurrency is introduced by user applications.
>> In my opinion, this probably not an issue from kernel perspective.
> 
> Perhaps not, but I recall there being a discussion about making KCSAN
> aware of memory accesses done by BPF programs (memcpy being a tiny
> subset of those). Not sure if the above data race qualifies as
> something we might want to still detect, i.e. a kernel dev testing
> their kernel might be interested in such a report.
> 
> Regardless, in this case we should teach syzkaller to ignore KCSAN
> data races that originate from bpf user operations whatever the
> origin.

I presume KCSAN could be silenced here via READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE conversion?

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index f58895830ada..32c4a37045f2 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -424,8 +424,11 @@ static inline void bpf_long_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, u32 size)
  	long *ldst = dst;

  	size /= sizeof(long);
-	while (size--)
-		*ldst++ = *lsrc++;
+	while (size--) {
+		WRITE_ONCE(*ldst, READ_ONCE(*lsrc));
+		ldst++;
+		lsrc++;
+	}
  }

  /* copy everything but bpf_spin_lock, bpf_timer, and kptrs. There could be one of each. */

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ