[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308300720.JEfxnfQ5-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 07:54:22 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Oza Pawandeep <quic_poza@...cinc.com>, sudeep.holla@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Oza Pawandeep <quic_poza@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast
timer
Hi Oza,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v6.5]
[cannot apply to rafael-pm/linux-next arm64/for-next/core linus/master next-20230829]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Oza-Pawandeep/cpuidle-ACPI-Evaluate-LPI-arch_flags-for-broadcast-timer/20230830-041258
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230829201101.3330337-1-quic_poza%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast timer
config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230830/202308300720.JEfxnfQ5-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230830/202308300720.JEfxnfQ5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308300720.JEfxnfQ5-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c: In function 'acpi_processor_setup_lpi_states':
>> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1220:61: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Wunused-value]
1220 | arch_update_idle_state_flags(lpi->arch_flags, &state->flags);
| ^
>> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1220:61: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
1220 | arch_update_idle_state_flags(lpi->arch_flags, &state->flags);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +1220 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
1201
1202 static int acpi_processor_setup_lpi_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
1203 {
1204 int i;
1205 struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
1206 struct cpuidle_state *state;
1207 struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &acpi_idle_driver;
1208
1209 if (!pr->flags.has_lpi)
1210 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
1211
1212 for (i = 0; i < pr->power.count && i < CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX; i++) {
1213 lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i];
1214
1215 state = &drv->states[i];
1216 snprintf(state->name, CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN, "LPI-%d", i);
1217 strscpy(state->desc, lpi->desc, CPUIDLE_DESC_LEN);
1218 state->exit_latency = lpi->wake_latency;
1219 state->target_residency = lpi->min_residency;
> 1220 arch_update_idle_state_flags(lpi->arch_flags, &state->flags);
1221 if (i != 0 && lpi->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
1222 state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_RCU_IDLE;
1223 state->enter = acpi_idle_lpi_enter;
1224 drv->safe_state_index = i;
1225 }
1226
1227 drv->state_count = i;
1228
1229 return 0;
1230 }
1231
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists