linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/microcode for v6.6-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230829044955.GBZO1486V0PJKFAoSv@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2023 06:49:55 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/microcode for v6.6-rc1

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 05:11:09PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> .. actually, I have now gotten around to Ingo's "Misc x86 cleanups"
> tree, and there I find the declaration movement to <asm/processor.h>
> by Arnd.
> 
> So I ended up just making my tree match at that point.

Yap, looks good, thanks.

The logic was to have the declarations in the processor.h header as the
definition is in the processor-specific file cpu/amd.c.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette