| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202308291359.QP042fIw-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:32:55 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, kernel@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] firmware: qcom-scm: use SHM bridge if available
Hi Bartosz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core linus/master v6.5]
[cannot apply to next-20230828]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bartosz-Golaszewski/firmware-qcom-scm-drop-unneeded-extern-specifiers/20230829-032930
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230828192507.117334-8-bartosz.golaszewski%40linaro.org
patch subject: [PATCH 07/11] firmware: qcom-scm: use SHM bridge if available
config: m68k-randconfig-r006-20230829 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230829/202308291359.QP042fIw-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230829/202308291359.QP042fIw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308291359.QP042fIw-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
m68k-linux-ld: drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.o: in function `__scm_smc_call':
>> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c:179:(.text+0xa8): undefined reference to `qcom_shm_bridge_alloc'
>> m68k-linux-ld: drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c:221:(.text+0x1ac): undefined reference to `qcom_shm_bridge_free'
m68k-linux-ld: drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c:206:(.text+0x23a): undefined reference to `qcom_shm_bridge_free'
vim +179 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c
148
149
150 int __scm_smc_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
151 enum qcom_scm_convention qcom_convention,
152 struct qcom_scm_res *res, bool atomic)
153 {
154 int arglen = desc->arginfo & 0xf;
155 int i, ret;
156 dma_addr_t args_phys = 0;
157 void *args_virt = NULL;
158 size_t alloc_len;
159 gfp_t flag = atomic ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL;
160 u32 smccc_call_type = atomic ? ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL : ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL;
161 u32 qcom_smccc_convention = (qcom_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32) ?
162 ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32 : ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64;
163 struct arm_smccc_res smc_res;
164 struct arm_smccc_args smc = {0};
165 bool using_shm_bridge = qcom_scm_shm_bridge_available();
166
167 smc.args[0] = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(
168 smccc_call_type,
169 qcom_smccc_convention,
170 desc->owner,
171 SCM_SMC_FNID(desc->svc, desc->cmd));
172 smc.args[1] = desc->arginfo;
173 for (i = 0; i < SCM_SMC_N_REG_ARGS; i++)
174 smc.args[i + SCM_SMC_FIRST_REG_IDX] = desc->args[i];
175
176 if (unlikely(arglen > SCM_SMC_N_REG_ARGS)) {
177 alloc_len = SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS * sizeof(u64);
178 if (using_shm_bridge)
> 179 args_virt = qcom_shm_bridge_alloc(NULL,
180 PAGE_ALIGN(alloc_len),
181 flag);
182 else
183 args_virt = kzalloc(PAGE_ALIGN(alloc_len), flag);
184 if (!args_virt)
185 return -ENOMEM;
186
187 if (qcom_smccc_convention == ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32) {
188 __le32 *args = args_virt;
189
190 for (i = 0; i < SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS; i++)
191 args[i] = cpu_to_le32(desc->args[i +
192 SCM_SMC_FIRST_EXT_IDX]);
193 } else {
194 __le64 *args = args_virt;
195
196 for (i = 0; i < SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS; i++)
197 args[i] = cpu_to_le64(desc->args[i +
198 SCM_SMC_FIRST_EXT_IDX]);
199 }
200
201 args_phys = dma_map_single(dev, args_virt, alloc_len,
202 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
203
204 if (dma_mapping_error(dev, args_phys)) {
205 if (using_shm_bridge)
206 qcom_shm_bridge_free(args_virt);
207 else
208 kfree(args_virt);
209 return -ENOMEM;
210 }
211
212 smc.args[SCM_SMC_LAST_REG_IDX] = args_phys;
213 }
214
215 /* ret error check follows after args_virt cleanup*/
216 ret = __scm_smc_do(dev, &smc, &smc_res, atomic);
217
218 if (args_virt) {
219 dma_unmap_single(dev, args_phys, alloc_len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
220 if (using_shm_bridge)
> 221 qcom_shm_bridge_free(args_virt);
222 else
223 kfree(args_virt);
224 }
225
226 if (ret)
227 return ret;
228
229 if (res) {
230 res->result[0] = smc_res.a1;
231 res->result[1] = smc_res.a2;
232 res->result[2] = smc_res.a3;
233 }
234
235 return (long)smc_res.a0 ? qcom_scm_remap_error(smc_res.a0) : 0;
236
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists