[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d53a098-bf0d-1b40-45c0-264a42d6e72d@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:21:15 +0530
From: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
To: <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
"Jagadeesh Kona" <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: Add RPMH clocks support for SM4450
On 8/25/2023 7:31 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/08/2023 19:34, Ajit Pandey wrote:
>> Add support for RPMH clocks for SM4450 platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>> index 4c5b552b47b6..5d853fd43294 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(ln_bb_clk3, _a2, "lnbclka3", 2);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(ln_bb_clk1, _a4, "lnbclka1", 4);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(ln_bb_clk2, _a4, "lnbclka2", 4);
>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(ln_bb_clk3, _a4, "lnbclka3", 4);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(ln_bb_clk2, _g4, "lnbclkg2", 4);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(ln_bb_clk3, _g4, "lnbclkg3", 4);
>> @@ -717,6 +718,25 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sdx75 = {
>> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdx75_rpmh_clocks),
>> };
>> +static struct clk_hw *sm4450_rpmh_clocks[] = {
>> + [RPMH_CXO_CLK] = &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div4.hw,
>> + [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A] = &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div4_ao.hw,
>
> Are you sure about div4 here ?
>
> Kailua uses div2 because the CXO input gets used divided by 2
> by PHYs and divided by 4 for GCC/DISPCC/...
>
> This is why we introduced a div2 clock in DT used to feed GCC/DISPCC/...
>
> Neil
Yes div4 is the correct divider only for sm4450 as CXO input get
directly divided by 4 only. This is someting similiar to sm8450 and
there is no in between div2 divider like Kailua.
>
>> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2] = &clk_rpmh_ln_bb_clk2_a4.hw,
>> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &clk_rpmh_ln_bb_clk2_a4_ao.hw,
>> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3] = &clk_rpmh_ln_bb_clk3_a4.hw,
>> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &clk_rpmh_ln_bb_clk3_a4_ao.hw,
>> + [RPMH_RF_CLK1] = &clk_rpmh_rf_clk1_a.hw,
>> + [RPMH_RF_CLK1_A] = &clk_rpmh_rf_clk1_a_ao.hw,
>> + [RPMH_RF_CLK5] = &clk_rpmh_rf_clk5_a.hw,
>> + [RPMH_RF_CLK5_A] = &clk_rpmh_rf_clk5_a_ao.hw,
>> + [RPMH_IPA_CLK] = &clk_rpmh_ipa.hw,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm4450 = {
>> + .clks = sm4450_rpmh_clocks,
>> + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm4450_rpmh_clocks),
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct clk_hw *of_clk_rpmh_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args
>> *clkspec,
>> void *data)
>> {
>> @@ -810,6 +830,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdx55},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdx65-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdx65},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdx75-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdx75},
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm4450-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm4450},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm6350},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150},
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8250},
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists