linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/11] thermal: exynos: switch from workqueue-driven interrupt handling to threaded interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:51:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@...sung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] thermal: exynos: switch from workqueue-driven
 interrupt handling to threaded interrupts

On 29/08/2023 11:18, Mateusz Majewski wrote:
> The workqueue boilerplate is mostly one-to-one what the threaded
> interrupts do.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@...sung.com>


>  	data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tmu_apbif");
>  	if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
> @@ -1094,8 +1080,10 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_sclk;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, data->irq, exynos_tmu_irq,
> -		IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), data);
> +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(
> +		&pdev->dev, data->irq, NULL, exynos_tmu_threaded_irq,

This does not look properly aligned.

Best regards,
Krzysztof