[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZO3F60iHQzxfjyTT@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:18:19 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marian Postevca <posteuca@...ex.one>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: es8316: Enable support for MCLK div by 2
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:22:15PM +0300, Marian Postevca wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> writes:
> > In general a MCLK that allows you to configure the dividers in the CODEC
> > appropriately for use. So long as it works your change looks fine I
> > think modulo.
> Sorry, maybe this question is dumb, but I am not familiar with this
> expression. What do you mean by "your change looks fine I think modulo"?
"modulo" means "apart from".
> > Use ARRAY_SIZE()
> Do you mean instead of all instances of NR_SUPPORTED_MCLK_LRCK_RATIOS?
> If so, it's already defined as:
> #define NR_SUPPORTED_MCLK_LRCK_RATIOS ARRAY_SIZE(supported_mclk_lrck_ratios)
Yes, that's what I meant - it might be as well to just drop the define
then since it's prompting this question at use sites? One of the goals
of ARRAY_SIZE() is to avoid having such defines and keep them in sync.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists