[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZO3ZvTOwn0dS0IcQ@debian>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 12:42:53 +0100
From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/84] 5.10.193-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.193 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:11:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.4.1 20230629):
mips: 63 configs -> 3 failures
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Note:
mips builds are failing with the error:
arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c: In function 'au1xxx_dbdma_put_source':
arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c:632:14: error: 'dma_default_coherent' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'dma_free_coherent'?
632 | if (!dma_default_coherent)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| dma_free_coherent
arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c:632:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c: In function 'au1xxx_dbdma_put_dest':
arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c:695:14: error: 'dma_default_coherent' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'dma_free_coherent'?
695 | if (!dma_default_coherent)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| dma_free_coherent
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4838
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4858
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists