lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7a05a44-c0be-46c2-a21d-b242524d482b@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2023 06:44:10 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
        artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, lenb@...nel.org,
        jgross@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Move MWAIT quirk out of acpi_processor.c

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 05:03:29PM +0300, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> Commit 2a2a64714d9c ("ACPI: Disable MWAIT via DMI on broken Compal board")
> introduced a workaround for MWAIT for a specific x86 system.
> 
> Move the code outside of acpi_processor.c to acpi/x86/ directory for
> consistency and rename the functions associated with it, so their names
> start with "acpi_proc_quirk_" to make the goal obvious.
> 
> No intentional functional impact.
> 

Except for:

ia64-linux-ld: drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.o: in function `acpi_early_processor_control_setup':
acpi_processor.c:(.init.text+0x712): undefined reference to `acpi_proc_quirk_mwait_check'
ia64-linux-ld: drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.o: in function `acpi_early_processor_set_pdc':
processor_pdc.c:(.init.text+0x72): undefined reference to `acpi_proc_quirk_mwait_check'

which breaks all ia64 builds.

Time to retire that architecture yet ? No one but me seems to even
build test it.

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ