[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ihBuCbojjOCV-kW-Gjo_nCP6EvpALwKUoyX36wypyiog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 17:02:27 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "Wilczynski, Michal" <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, lenb@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Move MWAIT quirk out of acpi_processor.c
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 4:53 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 04:38:33PM +0200, Wilczynski, Michal wrote:
> >
> [ ... ]
> > For the fix:
> > Acked-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>
> >
>
> Or just drop it. From Ard Biesheuvel's e-mail sent to 0-day:
Yeah.
> > Hello all,
> >
> > The Linux community is currently in the process of deprecating the
> > Itanium IA-64 architecture, which no longer has a maintainer or any
> > actual users.
> >
> > We aim to remove it entirely from the Linux tree before the end of the
> > year, but one of the first steps is to stop build testing it - there
> > is really no point any longer in spending any cycles on this, and it
> > is definitely undesirable to inform developers by email if their
> > changes result in any build issues on IA-64.
> >
> > So please remove IA64 from the set of architectures that are build
> > tested by LKP.
>
> This is from the 0-day commit log disabling ia64 build tests. I have now
> disabled ia64 in my build tests as well.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
No worries, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists