[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230830223741.7a4684d5@barney>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:37:41 +0200
From: Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Rand Deeb <deeb.rand@...fident.ru>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, voskresenski.stanislav@...fident.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ssb-main: Fix division by zero in ssb_calc_clock_rate()
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 14:50:42 -0500
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> wrote:
> I agree that clkfactor_f6_resolv() could return 0, but we have not
> been overrun with reports of divide by zero errors, which suggests
> that the branch is never taken. This patch will make your tool happy
> and is much simpler:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> index ab080cf26c9f..b9934b9c2d70 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static u32 clkfactor_f6_resolve(u32 v)
> case SSB_CHIPCO_CLK_F6_7:
> return 7;
> }
> - return 0;
> + return 1;
> }
Yes, I agree that this is the much simpler and also more sensible
solution to this theoretical problem.
--
Michael Büsch
https://bues.ch/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists