linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] nolibc: remove reliance on system headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZO+rJv/ZNokkyWpL@1wt.eu>
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:48:38 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>,
        Yuan Tan <tanyuan@...ylab.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] nolibc: remove reliance on system headers

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 05:07:11PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> This was prompted by the discussion about output directory support with
> O=.
> It seems sometimes we were pulling in system headers making testing
> annoying and unreliable.
> 
> Willy:
> 
> I did not implement the '#ifdef va_start` guard that we discussed
> before. In my understanding the latest agreement does not need it
> anymore. Please let me know if this is incorrect.

No that's fine given your goal of including just "nolibc.h" and no
other regular include file, I agree. I've just merged it and pushed
it to the -next branch.

Thank you Thomas!
Willy