[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230830225921.GA15759@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:59:21 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"open list:NETFILTER" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETFILTER" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lucas Leong <wmliang@...osec.exchange>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter/osf: avoid OOB read
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com> wrote:
> The opt_num field is controlled by user mode and is not currently
> validated inside the kernel. An attacker can take advantage of this to
> trigger an OOB read and potentially leak information.
[..]
Can you send a v2 that rejects bogus nf_osf_user_finger structs?
nfnl_osf_add_callback() seems to be the right place to refuse it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists