[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0b88cfe-3afe-688d-861c-a9a332f66676@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:14:00 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf metric: Add #num_cpus_online literal
On 2023-08-30 3:30 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> Returns the number of CPUs online, unlike #num_cpus that returns the
> number present. Add a test of the property. This will be used in
> future Intel metrics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Kan
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 5 ++++-
> tools/perf/util/expr.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> index c1c3fcbc2753..81229fa4f1e9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> {
> struct expr_id_data *val_ptr;
> const char *p;
> - double val, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
> + double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
> int ret;
> struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
> bool is_intel = false;
> @@ -227,7 +227,10 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
>
> /* Test toplogy constants appear well ordered. */
> expr__ctx_clear(ctx);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus_online",
> + expr__parse(&num_cpus_online, ctx, "#num_cpus_online") == 0);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus", expr__parse(&num_cpus, ctx, "#num_cpus") == 0);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cpus_online", num_cpus >= num_cpus_online);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cores", expr__parse(&num_cores, ctx, "#num_cores") == 0);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cores", num_cpus >= num_cores);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies", expr__parse(&num_dies, ctx, "#num_dies") == 0);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> index 0985a3cbc6f9..4488f306de78 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> @@ -427,6 +427,13 @@ double expr__get_literal(const char *literal, const struct expr_scanner_ctx *ctx
> result = cpu__max_present_cpu().cpu;
> goto out;
> }
> + if (!strcmp("#num_cpus_online", literal)) {
> + struct perf_cpu_map *online = cpu_map__online();
> +
> + if (online)
> + result = perf_cpu_map__nr(online);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> if (!strcasecmp("#system_tsc_freq", literal)) {
> result = arch_get_tsc_freq();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists