[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cbd7dda4bb20989ccb3facb62243ceaf1f2855a0.1693416477.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 19:35:31 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] regulator/core: regulator_lock_nested: skip extra lock
for -EDEADLK
When ww_mutex_lock() returns -EDEADLK the nesting mutex-protected
section becomes a no-op. Return early and avoid the extra lock.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 215b721e5cd4..921c7039baa3 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -145,18 +145,17 @@ static inline int regulator_lock_nested(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
mutex_lock(®ulator_nesting_mutex);
- if (!ww_mutex_trylock(&rdev->mutex, ww_ctx)) {
- if (rdev->mutex_owner != current) {
- mutex_unlock(®ulator_nesting_mutex);
- ret = ww_mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex, ww_ctx);
- mutex_lock(®ulator_nesting_mutex);
- }
+ if (!ww_mutex_trylock(&rdev->mutex, ww_ctx) &&
+ rdev->mutex_owner != current) {
+ mutex_unlock(®ulator_nesting_mutex);
+ ret = ww_mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex, ww_ctx);
+ if (ret == -EDEADLK)
+ return ret;
+ mutex_lock(®ulator_nesting_mutex);
}
- if (ret != -EDEADLK) {
- rdev->ref_cnt++;
- rdev->mutex_owner = current;
- }
+ rdev->ref_cnt++;
+ rdev->mutex_owner = current;
mutex_unlock(®ulator_nesting_mutex);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists