[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <947f4170-f8ca-11db-15bc-aafdd1670fe9@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 12:06:49 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/129] 4.19.293-rc1 review
On 30/08/2023 12:04, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:11:34 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.293 release.
>> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:11:30 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.293-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v4.19:
> 11 builds: 6 pass, 5 fail
> 14 boots: 14 pass, 0 fail
> 24 tests: 24 pass, 0 fail
>
> Linux version: 4.19.293-rc1-ga291d82603f3
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Builds failed: aarch64+defconfig+jetson, arm+multi_v7
It is the same build issue everyone is reporting ...
kernel/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c: In function ‘sysc_reset’:
kernel/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c:982:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sysc_read_sysconfig’; did you mean ‘sysc_read_revision’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
val = sysc_read_sysconfig(ddata);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists