linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/7] regulator/core: regulator_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2023 19:35:31 +0200
From:   Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] regulator/core: regulator_lock_nested: simplify nested
 locking

Simplify regulator locking by removing locking around locking.
rdev->ref check when unlocking is moved inside the critical section.

This patch depends on commit 12235da8c80a ("kernel/locking: Add context
to ww_mutex_trylock()").

Note: return -EALREADY is removed as no caller depends on it and in that
case the lock count is incremented anyway.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 921c7039baa3..f18e7cb88a0d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 
 static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(regulator_ww_class);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(regulator_nesting_mutex);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(regulator_list_mutex);
 static LIST_HEAD(regulator_map_list);
 static LIST_HEAD(regulator_ena_gpio_list);
@@ -141,25 +140,18 @@ static bool regulator_ops_is_valid(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int ops)
 static inline int regulator_lock_nested(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 					struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	mutex_lock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
-
 	if (!ww_mutex_trylock(&rdev->mutex, ww_ctx) &&
-	    rdev->mutex_owner != current) {
-		mutex_unlock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
-		ret = ww_mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex, ww_ctx);
+	    READ_ONCE(rdev->mutex_owner) != current) {
+		int ret = ww_mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex, ww_ctx);
+
 		if (ret == -EDEADLK)
 			return ret;
-		mutex_lock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
 	}
 
 	rdev->ref_cnt++;
 	rdev->mutex_owner = current;
 
-	mutex_unlock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
-
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -186,16 +178,13 @@ static void regulator_lock(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
  */
 static void regulator_unlock(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rdev->ref_cnt <= 0))
+		return;
 
 	if (--rdev->ref_cnt == 0) {
 		rdev->mutex_owner = NULL;
 		ww_mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
 	}
-
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdev->ref_cnt < 0);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.39.2