[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d79d1f9-00e8-93be-3c7c-244030521cd7@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:36:53 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Dragan Stancevic <dragan@...ncevic.com>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, song@...nel.org
Cc: buczek@...gen.mpg.de, guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev,
it+raid@...gen.mpg.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, msmith626@...il.com,
"yangerkun@...wei.com" <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: md_raid: mdX_raid6 looping after sync_action "check" to "idle"
transition
Hi,
在 2023/08/29 4:32, Dragan Stancevic 写道:
> Just a followup on 6.1 testing. I tried reproducing this problem for 5
> days with 6.1.42 kernel without your patches and I was not able to
> reproduce it.
>
> It seems that 6.1 has some other code that prevents this from happening.
>
I see that there are lots of patches for raid456 between 5.10 and 6.1,
however, I remember that I used to reporduce the deadlock after 6.1, and
it's true it's not easy to reporduce, see below:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/e9067438-d713-f5f3-0d3d-9e6b0e9efa0e@huaweicloud.com/
My guess is that 6.1 is harder to reporduce than 5.10 due to some
changes inside raid456.
By the way, raid10 had a similiar deadlock, and can be fixed the same
way, so it make sense to backport these patches.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230529132037.2124527-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Thanks,
Kuai
> On 5.10 I can reproduce it within minutes to an hour.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists