linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adding MCP3564 ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac2296410c46aac0166252defdf4dd5082c67ebe.camel@microchip.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:33:12 +0000
From:   <Marius.Cristea@...rochip.com>
To:     <jic23@...nel.org>, <lars@...afoo.de>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adding MCP3564 ADC

Hi Krzysztof,


On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 19:10 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
> 
> On 29/08/2023 17:41, marius.cristea@...rochip.com wrote:
> > From: Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@...rochip.com>
> > 
> > This is the device tree schema for iio driver for
> > Microchip family of 153.6 ksps, Low-Noise 16/24-Bit
> > Delta-Sigma ADCs with an SPI interface (Microchip's
> > MCP3461, MCP3462, MCP3464, MCP3461R, MCP3462R,
> > MCP3464R, MCP3561, MCP3562, MCP3564, MCP3561R,
> > MCP3562R and MCP3564R analog to digital converters).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/iio/adc/microchip,mcp3564.yaml   | 205
> > ++++++++++++++++++
> 
> What changed? Cover letter says nothing about binding, so this patch
> must say. Especially that you decided to ignore review.
> 

  My bad. I was bad handling the resubmition of the patch. I was not
"aware" that I need to keep the "reviewed-by" for the following
patches.

This patch didn't change anything to the "microchip,mcp3564.yaml" file.



> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>