[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bf7b4e1-2c55-f550-2395-f0b7e83e3056@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 12:17:35 +0100
From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] hugetlb: batch TLB flushes when freeing vmemmap
On 30/08/2023 09:23, Muchun Song wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/8/26 03:04, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
>>
>> Now that a list of pages is deduplicated at once, the TLB
>> flush can be batched for all vmemmap pages that got remapped.
>>
>> Add a flags field and pass whether it's a bulk allocation or
>> just a single page to decide to remap.
>>
>> The TLB flush is global as we don't have guarantees from caller
>> that the set of folios is contiguous, or to add complexity in
>> composing a list of kVAs to flush.
>>
>> Modified by Mike Kravetz to perform TLB flush on single folio if an
>> error is encountered.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> index 904a64fe5669..a2fc7b03ac6b 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct vmemmap_remap_walk {
>> unsigned long reuse_addr;
>> struct list_head *vmemmap_pages;
>> #define VMEMMAP_REMAP_ONLY_SPLIT BIT(0)
>> +#define VMEMMAP_REMAP_BULK_PAGES BIT(1)
>
> We could reuse the flag (as I suggest VMEMMAP_SPLIT_WITHOUT_FLUSH)
> proposed in the patch 10. When I saw this patch, I think the name
> is not suitable, maybe VMEMMAP_WITHOUT_TLB_FLUSH is better.
>
As mentioned in the previous patch, yeah makes sense to have a bit just for
no TLB flush and perhaps we don't even BIT(1). We can use remap_pte to tell PTE
vs PMD flush "skipping"
> Thanks.
>
>> unsigned long flags;
>> };
>> @@ -211,7 +212,8 @@ static int vmemmap_remap_range(unsigned long start,
>> unsigned long end,
>> return ret;
>> } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>> - if (!(walk->flags & VMEMMAP_REMAP_ONLY_SPLIT))
>> + if (!(walk->flags &
>> + (VMEMMAP_REMAP_ONLY_SPLIT | VMEMMAP_REMAP_BULK_PAGES)))
>> flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
>> return 0;
>> @@ -377,7 +379,7 @@ static int vmemmap_remap_free(unsigned long start,
>> unsigned long end,
>> .remap_pte = vmemmap_remap_pte,
>> .reuse_addr = reuse,
>> .vmemmap_pages = &vmemmap_pages,
>> - .flags = 0,
>> + .flags = !bulk_pages ? 0 : VMEMMAP_REMAP_BULK_PAGES,
>> };
>> int nid = page_to_nid((struct page *)start);
>> gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_THISNODE | __GFP_NORETRY |
>> @@ -427,6 +429,7 @@ static int vmemmap_remap_free(unsigned long start,
>> unsigned long end,
>> .remap_pte = vmemmap_restore_pte,
>> .reuse_addr = reuse,
>> .vmemmap_pages = &vmemmap_pages,
>> + .flags = 0,
>> };
>> vmemmap_remap_range(reuse, end, &walk);
>> @@ -700,6 +703,8 @@ void hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folios(struct hstate *h,
>> struct list_head *folio_l
>> list_for_each_entry(folio, folio_list, lru)
>> hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_bulk(h, &folio->page, &vmemmap_pages);
>> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(0, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
>> +
>> free_vmemmap_page_list(&vmemmap_pages);
>> }
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists