| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 12:11:24 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, ito-yuichi@...itsu.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v12 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To enable NMI backtrace and KGDB's NMI cpu roundup, we need to free up
at least one dedicated IPI.
On arm64 the IPI_WAKEUP IPI is only used for the ACPI parking protocol,
which itself is only used on some very early ARMv8 systems which
couldn't implement PSCI.
Remove the IPI_WAKEUP IPI, and rely on the IPI_RESCHEDULE IPI to wake
CPUs from the parked state. This will cause a tiny amonut of redundant
work to check the thread flags, but this is miniscule in relation to the
cost of taking and handling the IPI in the first place. We can safely
handle redundant IPI_RESCHEDULE IPIs, so there should be no functional
impact as a result of this change.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
---
I have no idea how to test this. I just took Mark's patch and jammed
it into my series. Logicially the patch seems reasonable to me.
(no changes since v11)
Changes in v11:
- arch_send_wakeup_ipi() now takes an unsigned int.
Changes in v10:
- ("arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI") new for v10.
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 28 +++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
index 9b31e6d0da17..efb13112b408 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ extern void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
extern void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
-extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
+extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu);
#else
-static inline void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
+static inline void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
{
BUILD_BUG();
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
index b1990e38aed0..e1be29e608b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
&mailbox->entry_point);
writel_relaxed(cpu_entry->gic_cpu_id, &mailbox->cpu_id);
- arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
+ arch_send_wakeup_ipi(cpu);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 960b98b43506..a5848f1ef817 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
IPI_TIMER,
IPI_IRQ_WORK,
- IPI_WAKEUP,
NR_IPI
};
@@ -764,7 +763,6 @@ static const char *ipi_types[NR_IPI] __tracepoint_string = {
[IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP] = "CPU stop (for crash dump) interrupts",
[IPI_TIMER] = "Timer broadcast interrupts",
[IPI_IRQ_WORK] = "IRQ work interrupts",
- [IPI_WAKEUP] = "CPU wake-up interrupts",
};
static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr);
@@ -797,13 +795,6 @@ void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
-void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
-{
- smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_WAKEUP);
-}
-#endif
-
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
{
@@ -897,14 +888,6 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
break;
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
- case IPI_WAKEUP:
- WARN_ONCE(!acpi_parking_protocol_valid(cpu),
- "CPU%u: Wake-up IPI outside the ACPI parking protocol\n",
- cpu);
- break;
-#endif
-
default:
pr_crit("CPU%u: Unknown IPI message 0x%x\n", cpu, ipinr);
break;
@@ -979,6 +962,17 @@ void arch_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_RESCHEDULE);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
+void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ /*
+ * We use a scheduler IPI to wake the CPU as this avoids the need for a
+ * dedicated IPI and we can safely handle spurious scheduler IPIs.
+ */
+ arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+}
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
void tick_broadcast(const struct cpumask *mask)
{
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists