[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308311409.F4EC8BC674@keescook>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:11:32 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/audit: fix -Wmissing-variable-declarations warning
for ia32_xyz_class
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:33:16PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> When building x86 defconfig with Clang-18 I get the following warnings:
> | arch/x86/ia32/audit.c:6:10: warning: no previous extern declaration for non-static variable 'ia32_dir_class' [-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
> | 6 | unsigned ia32_dir_class[] = {
> | arch/x86/ia32/audit.c:11:10: warning: no previous extern declaration for non-static variable 'ia32_chattr_class' [-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
> | 11 | unsigned ia32_chattr_class[] = {
> | arch/x86/ia32/audit.c:16:10: warning: no previous extern declaration for non-static variable 'ia32_write_class' [-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
> | 16 | unsigned ia32_write_class[] = {
> | arch/x86/ia32/audit.c:21:10: warning: no previous extern declaration for non-static variable 'ia32_read_class' [-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
> | 21 | unsigned ia32_read_class[] = {
> | arch/x86/ia32/audit.c:26:10: warning: no previous extern declaration for non-static variable 'ia32_signal_class' [-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
> | 26 | unsigned ia32_signal_class[] = {
>
> These warnings occur due to their respective extern declarations being
> scoped inside of audit_classes_init as well as only being enabled with
> `CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y`:
> | static int __init audit_classes_init(void)
> | {
> | #ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> | extern __u32 ia32_dir_class[];
> | extern __u32 ia32_write_class[];
> | extern __u32 ia32_read_class[];
> | extern __u32 ia32_chattr_class[];
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_WRITE_32, ia32_write_class);
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_READ_32, ia32_read_class);
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_DIR_WRITE_32, ia32_dir_class);
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_CHATTR_32, ia32_chattr_class);
> | #endif
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_WRITE, write_class);
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_READ, read_class);
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_DIR_WRITE, dir_class);
> | audit_register_class(AUDIT_CLASS_CHATTR, chattr_class);
> | return 0;
> | }
>
> Lift the extern declarations to their own header and resolve scoping
> issues (and thus fix the warnings).
>
> Moreover, change __u32 to unsigned so that we match the definitions:
> | unsigned ia32_dir_class[] = {
> | #include <asm-generic/audit_dir_write.h>
> | ~0U
> | };
> |
> | unsigned ia32_chattr_class[] = {
> | #include <asm-generic/audit_change_attr.h>
> | ~0U
> | };
> | ...
I would expect checkpatch to warn about bare "unsigned", which is frown
on these days. :) I think __u32 should be fine here...? (Why is it __u32
instead of u32, btw?)
But otherwise, yes, looks good.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists