[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230831092043.GA29822@varda-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:50:44 +0530
From: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<kishon@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
<nfraprado@...labora.com>, <rafal@...ecki.pl>, <peng.fan@....com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add USB related nodes
> > + usb: usb@...8800 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,ipq5332-dwc3", "qcom,dwc3";
> > + reg = <0x08af8800 0x400>;
> > +
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-names = "hs_phy_irq";
> > +
> > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_MASTER_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_SLEEP_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
> > + clock-names = "core",
> > + "iface",
> > + "sleep",
> > + "mock_utmi";
> > +
> > + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB_BCR>;
> > +
> > + qcom,select-utmi-as-pipe-clk;
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges;
> > +
> > + status = "disabled";
> > +
> > + usb2_0_dwc: usb@...0000 {
>
> Since we have just seen a patch series adding USB 3 support to
> ipq5332, we know that the host is not 2.0-only. Thus the `2_0` part of
> the label doesn't make sense.
>
> Could you please change the label to be just usb_dwc (or usb0_dwc)?
Have posted v12 addressing this. Please take a look.
Thanks
Varada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists