linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] iommu: Make iommu_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <94c39a16-cd25-7cd2-33dd-f6bd43056db4@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:42:13 +0800
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] iommu: Make iommu_queue_iopf() more generic

On 2023/8/30 16:50, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Tian, Kevin
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 3:44 PM
>>
>>> From: Baolu Lu<baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2023 4:01 PM
>>>
>>> On 8/25/23 4:17 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>>    /**
>>>>>     * iopf_queue_flush_dev - Ensure that all queued faults have been
>>>>> processed
>>>>>     * @dev: the endpoint whose faults need to be flushed.
>>>> Presumably we also need a flush callback per domain given now
>>>> the use of workqueue is optional then flush_workqueue() might
>>>> not be sufficient.
>>>>
>>> The iopf_queue_flush_dev() function flushes all pending faults from the
>>> IOMMU queue for a specific device. It has no means to flush fault queues
>>> out of iommu core.
>>>
>>> The iopf_queue_flush_dev() function is typically called when a domain is
>>> detaching from a PASID. Hence it's necessary to flush the pending faults
>>> from top to bottom. For example, iommufd should flush pending faults in
>>> its fault queues after detaching the domain from the pasid.
>>>
>> Is there an ordering problem? The last step of intel_svm_drain_prq()
>> in the detaching path issues a set of descriptors to drain page requests
>> and responses in hardware. It cannot complete if not all software queues
>> are drained and it's counter-intuitive to drain a software queue after
>> the hardware draining has already been completed.
> to be clear it's correct to drain request queues from bottom to top as the
> lower level queue is the input to the higher level queue. But for response
> the lowest draining needs to wait for response from higher levels. It's
> interesting that intel-iommu driver combines draining hw page requests
> and responses in one step in intel_svm_drain_prq(). this also needs some
> consideration regarding to iommufd...
> 

I agree with you. For the responses, we can iterate over the list of
page requests pending to respond. If any fault matches the pasid and the
device, we can drain it by responding IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID to the
device.

After that the responses for the drained faults will be dropped by the
iommu_page_response() interface.

Best regards,
baolu