[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64efebdc97b9f_29e220294e6@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 18:24:44 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>
CC: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] configfs-tsm: Introduce a shared ABI for
attestation reports
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
[..]
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig
> > index 14246fc2fb02..22dd59e19431 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > config TDX_GUEST_DRIVER
> > tristate "TDX Guest driver"
> > depends on INTEL_TDX_GUEST
> > + select TSM_REPORTS
>
> I think it is more appropriate to let TDX support patch add it. Agree?
Oh definitely, I think this was a leftover from some local debug.
I have fixed that up along with Greg's feedback and pushed an updated
set here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/linux.git/log/?h=for-6.7/coco
...will keep that up to date as review feedback arrives.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists